Convection & Shapes: How Would They Affect Heat Plate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hollysmoke
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convection
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on how different shapes of obstacles, such as a heat plate with nothing, a bundle of tubes, and fins, influence convection in a vertical airflow scenario. It highlights that flow lines downstream of an obstacle become homogenized within a distance comparable to the obstacle's width. Specifically, for cylindrical tubes, this distance is equal to their diameter, while for other shapes like tear-drop, it can be significantly smaller. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for optimizing heat transfer in designs involving convection. The conversation emphasizes the importance of shape in affecting airflow and heat distribution.
Hollysmoke
Messages
185
Reaction score
0
Hi, I was wondering if someone could help explain how the following shapes would affect convection. What it is is a heat plate with nothing, a bundle of tubes, and just fins. It's in a vertical tube and the air flows upwards. I understand convection but I don't get how it would be affected in terms of a physical object such as these in its path.

http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/718/heatplatesf1.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
The rule of thumb I use is that flow lines just downstream of an obstacle get very close to their far-away away structure within a distance comparable to the width of the obstacle. So if the tubes have a diameter d, then at a distance d downstream from each tube, the flow-lines are essentially homogenized again. For some shapes (tear-drop, for instance), this distance can be much smaller than the width of the object.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top