Converting a Shifted Circle into Polar Coordinates

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tarhead
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coordinate Polar
AI Thread Summary
To express a shifted circle in polar coordinates, the equation (x-h)² + (y-k)² = h² + k² requires transformations where x = r cos θ and y = r sin θ. The parameters h and k indicate a shift in the origin, necessitating four parameters to fully describe the circle in either Cartesian or polar coordinates. While the transformations can be applied, the constants h and k simplify the process, making it unnecessary to complicate the conversion. The discussion emphasizes that only two variables are needed to plot a one-dimensional object in a two-dimensional space. Understanding these transformations is crucial for accurately representing the shifted circle in polar coordinates.
Tarhead
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
How do I express this in polar coordinates?

(x-h)^2+(y-k)^2= h^2+k^2

It is a circle with k and h greater than 0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
go to:

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PolarCoordinates.html

I think the transforms would be

x--> rcos theta
y--> r sin theta
h --> R cos theta'
k --> R sin theta'

4 prameters to describe the points on a shifted circle (shifted orgin because of the k and h terms) in either cartesian or polar coordinates

Not sure, but I think.
 
In two dimensions, the transformations are:

x = r\cos \theta, \qquad y = r\sin \theta

That's all you need.
 
Yeah this makes sense. Sorry for my mistake. You'll only need two variables to plot a 1-d object in a 2d space.

You would need four parameters to specify a shifted circle in either coordinate system. (The k and h parameters will propagate through your transformation.) You could transform this shift into polar coordinates as well (and you would have to if this was a complicated mechanics problem) but you don't even need to bother with this because it is given as a constant.

Hope I didn't mess you up. Sorry again.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top