Converting acceleration to velocity to displacement graph

AI Thread Summary
To convert an acceleration vs. time graph to a velocity vs. time graph, one must calculate the area under the acceleration curve, which represents the change in velocity over time. This area can be positive or negative, depending on whether it is above or below the time axis. Subsequently, to derive a displacement vs. time graph from the velocity vs. time graph, the same area concept applies, where the area under the velocity curve indicates the displacement. The discussion emphasizes that this process does not require the use of integrals but relies on understanding the relationship between area and graphing. Overall, calculating areas under the curves is crucial for transitioning between these types of graphs.
captainsmith1
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


the task is to explain how to find the velocity vs time graph from an acceleration vs time graph and how to find a displacement vs time graph from the resulting velocity vs time graph, without using an intergral.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


i know that area must be used, and how to find the area, but i don't know how that is supposed to produce a graph
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi captainsmith1! Welcome to PF! :wink:
captainsmith1 said:
the task is to explain how to find the velocity vs time graph from an acceleration vs time graph and how to find a displacement vs time graph from the resulting velocity vs time graph, without using an intergral.

i know that area must be used, and how to find the area, but i don't know how that is supposed to produce a graph

Easy-peasy …

the integral of a function equals the area between the curve of the function and the horizontal axis (and areas below count as negative) …

so just work out how the area depends on time, and then do a rough graph. :smile:
 
sorry this is over a month late but thanks alot!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top