Convert m/s to N? Chart Vectors Graphically

  • Thread starter Thread starter tvshonk
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Converting meters per second (m/s) to Newtons is unnecessary for graphing velocity vectors, as they represent different physical quantities. The angles provided should be plotted directly, with negative degrees indicating a clockwise rotation from the positive x-axis. To visualize the vectors accurately, a compass can help clarify the direction of each angle. Using a consistent scale factor will aid in laying out the vectors graphically. Understanding these concepts will lead to a more accurate representation of the vectors.
tvshonk
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm charting vectors graphically and am given: 15m/s at 20 degrees + 6m/s at 90 degrees + 8 m/s at -135degrees. Do I have to convert the m/s into Newtons before graphing? Also, which direction would that -135degrees be in if you start at a point? I have no idea what the negative degrees mean and haven't found help online.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Tried laying it out similar to if I had N and graphed it to scale, but my numbers were way off.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A) No. existing units are just fine.
 
Have you tried drawing a compass and showing the angles?

If you plot x, y or z, positive is one way, and negative is the other way. So if your angles increase from 0 when you rotate counter-clockwise, what happens to the Angle when you go the other way?
 
tvshonk said:

Homework Statement


I'm charting vectors graphically and am given: 15m/s at 20 degrees + 6m/s at 90 degrees + 8 m/s at -135degrees. Do I have to convert the m/s into Newtons before graphing? Also, which direction would that -135degrees be in if you start at a point? I have no idea what the negative degrees mean and haven't found help online.

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


Tried laying it out similar to if I had N and graphed it to scale, but my numbers were way off.
It makes no sense to convert to Newtons. The to sets of units refer to completely different physical quantities.

Just use a convenient scale factor to lay the velocity vectors out graphically.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top