Converting surface integral to line

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have the following integral
<br /> \int_{ABC}{\mathbf{v}\cdot \nabla f_id\sigma}<br />
where $d\sigma$ is an area element, $\mathbf v$ is a velocity vector and f_i some function. The integral is performed across a triangle ABC and it is assumed that f is linear.

In my book this integral becomes
<br /> \mathbf v\cdot \int_{AB}{f_id\mathbf l} + I_s,<br />
where I_s is the flux across BC and AC. Can someone explain to me how this integral is solved?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use "Stoke's theorem" that you should remember from Calculus:
\oint_C \vec{f}\cdot d\vec{r}= \int_\sigma\int \nabla\times\vec{f}dS
where C is the boundary of surface \sigma.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Use "Stoke's theorem" that you should remember from Calculus:
\oint_C \vec{f}\cdot d\vec{r}= \int_\sigma\int \nabla\times\vec{f}dS
where C is the boundary of surface \sigma.

Hi HallsofIvy

Thanks, I remember that. But the RHS is in terms of a rotation operatir, not the gradient as I have.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top