Cookie Question: Ratio of Diameter to Thickness and Uncertainty

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hi.O303
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uncertainty
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the ratio of the diameter to the thickness of a cookie, which is 8.5 cm with an uncertainty of ±0.02 cm and a thickness of 0.050 cm with an uncertainty of ±0.005 cm. The initial calculation yields a ratio of 170 ± 4 cm, but there is confusion regarding the correct uncertainty of ±20 cm provided by another source. Participants highlight the importance of considering percent error when performing division, which impacts the final uncertainty. Adjustments to the calculations reveal discrepancies in the derived values, suggesting that the uncertainties need to be reassessed. The conversation emphasizes the need for accurate error propagation in ratio calculations.
Hi.O303
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I saw similar types of problems like this using Google search, but none of them answered this question specifically.

Homework Statement



As you eat your way through a bag of chocolate chip cookies, you observe that each cookie is a circular disk with a diameter of 8.5 +/- 0.02 cm and a thickness of 0.050 +/- 0.005 cm.

Find the ratio of the diameter to the thickness and the uncertainty in this ratio.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


So what I did was just put 8.50 +/- 0.02 cm divided by 0.050 cm. My answer was :
170 +/- 4cm

Their answer was : 170 +/- 20 cm.

So I see where they got the 170 from, but I'm not sure why they 20cm is there.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In such questions, try to get the biggest ratio possible and the smallest one.
 
Okay, I did that and I got the two answers : 154.9 and 188.4, but the difference between them isn't 20.
 
They seem to be rounding the error to one significant figure.

Have you been told about adding the percent error when doing multiplication or division?

EDIT:
Okay, I did that and I got the two answers : 154.9 and 188.4, but the difference between them isn't 20.

Just FYI, those numbers are a little off. For example,
8.48/0.055 = ____? (slightly less than the 154.9 you gave)
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top