Why is copper wire not commonly used in potentiometers?

AI Thread Summary
Copper wire is not commonly used in potentiometers due to its low resistivity, which can lead to inaccurate readings. Additionally, copper experiences work-hardening, making it less suitable for applications requiring flexibility. The formation of copper oxide can also affect performance negatively. While these issues could be addressed, using resistance wire is a more straightforward solution. Overall, resistance wire offers better reliability and performance for potentiometer applications.
harini_5
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
I’ve learned that copper wire is not generally used in a potentiometer. Is there any specific reason for this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Generally the big problems you would face in using copper are: (1) low resistivity; (2) work-hardening; and (3) the formation of copper oxide. All of these could be overcome, but it's so much easier to just use resistance wire.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top