Coriolis Effect on Fast Projectile

AI Thread Summary
The Coriolis effect causes a projectile fired nearly horizontally to be deflected to the south, contrary to initial assumptions about upward movement due to Earth's curvature. The discussion highlights confusion over the terminology of "nearly horizontal" versus "nearly vertical," with participants debating the implications for projectile motion. The Coriolis acceleration is described mathematically as \vec{a}_C = -2\vec{\omega} \times \vec{v}_0, indicating a southward deflection. A formula for the deflection is provided as \omega D^2 \sin\lambda / v_0. The conversation emphasizes the complexities of understanding projectile motion in relation to Earth's rotation.
e(ho0n3
Messages
1,349
Reaction score
0
A projectile is fired nearly horizontally at high velocity v_0 toward the east. (a) In what direction is it deflected by the Coriolis effect? (b) Determine a formula for the deflection is terms of v_0, the angular velocity \omega of the earth, the latitude \lambda where the projectile is fired, and the distance traveled D.

I don't know why the problem says "nearly horizontal" instead of just horizontal. Since the projectile is traveling pretty fast, I guess I can ignore the effects of gravity.

Now, suppose I shoot somebody located directly east of me (how evil!). Since the Earth is round, the shot will be gaining height with respect to the ground directly below it right? Now, from the shooter's perspective, this is also happening right? So the shot is moving upward. Now I haven't made any use of the Coriolis effect so my latter explanation is probably bogus. Now, \vec{a}_C = -2\vec{\omega} \times \vec{v}_0. Using the right hand rule, it seems that the Coriolis acceleration \vec{a}_C is pointing away from the Earth which seems to support my first idea. Now, the books answer is South for some unknown reason so I don't know what to think anymore. Any help here?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the question meant to say "nearly vertically". The verticality would be affected by the Coriolis acceleration making it impossible to be exactly vertical.

Yes, if you threw horizontally, there would not be a southward migration. Unless it's winter and you're throwing birds.
 
Gokul43201 said:
I think the question meant to say "nearly vertically". The verticality would be affected by the Coriolis acceleration making it impossible to be exactly vertical.
But how do you throw "nearly vertically" to the east. That makes no sense unless I'm throwing at an angle to the horizontal. I'll post the answer to (b) in hopes of any enlightment.

Answer (b): \omega D^2 \sin\lambda / v_0
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
8K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Back
Top