Correctly solve this wave related question with step-by-step explanation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Logistics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wave
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a wave interference problem involving two speakers. Participants highlight the need to understand the conditions for destructive interference and the importance of calculating the path length difference between the speakers. A correct calculation of the wavelength and the geometry of the situation is emphasized, with suggestions to draw diagrams for clarity. The small angle approximation is debated, with one participant ultimately finding it helpful in visualizing the problem. The conversation concludes with a sense of accomplishment after clarifying the concepts involved.
Logistics
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Could someone please have a look at this question+working out and tell me if I did it correctly.

http://people.mail2me.com.au/~benogorancic/que.JPG
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Part B is not correct. From part A you should be able to figure out how far apart the speakers are. Think again about what conditions cause destructive interference, and check the formula that represents those conditions.
 
I'm sorry but I need more info.

This topic is new to me, been reading all day on the net and nothing :(
 
Logistics said:
I'm sorry but I need more info.

This topic is new to me, been reading all day on the net and nothing :(

Draw a diagram. Part A says you are on a line between the two speakers, 3 meters from the one on the right and 3.5 meteres from the one on the left. You have correctly calculated the wavelength as .5 meters, so at the starting point the path length difference from the two speakers to where you are is one wavelength. That means you have constructive interference, and that is why the sound is louder.

As you walk into the area in front of the speakers, you will eventually reach a point where the path difference is half a wavelength, or 1.5 wavelengths or 2.5 wavelengths. There you will have destructive interference and you will not be abel to hear. You need to figure out the geometry of that. There is a formula for it. It looks similar to the one you tried to use, but that is not quite it. You cannot use the small angle approximation in this problem. I suggest you just look at the distances involved and basic geometry for this first problem. The application of the formula will make more sense after that.

Edit

I looked at this a bit more carefully. The small angle approximation is not so bad after all. I drew a diagram. The solid arcs are whole number wavelengths from the speakers. The dashed arcs are half way in between, so they are n + 1/2 wavelengths from the speakeers. The blue lines trace the points where the path difference from the two speakers is zero wavelengths, one wavelength, or two wavelengths. The thin black straight line is the path you walk on. Where will destructive interference be encountered? How does that relate to the equation for where destructive interference should be found some distance D from the sources and a distance y from the center line?

Here is a different sort of diagram, and an explanation that will help.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/slits.html
 

Attachments

  • Interference.jpg
    Interference.jpg
    68.4 KB · Views: 416
Last edited:
OMG finally got it done, can't believe it ended up so simple arggg omg lol

Thanks for your help
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top