Can the Numerical Value of Sin or Cos be Derived Without a Calculator?

  • Thread starter Thread starter haribol
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cos Sin Tan
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the numerical values of sine and cosine without a calculator, specifically for angles like pi/6. It emphasizes using geometric methods, such as constructing an equilateral triangle and applying the Pythagorean theorem to find the lengths of the sides. The values derived include sin(pi/6) = 1/2 and cos(pi/6) = √3/2, along with other trigonometric functions. While some participants suggest memorization as a practical approach, others mention the potential of using infinite series for derivation. Ultimately, understanding these relationships and methods allows for calculating trigonometric values without reliance on technology.
haribol
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Assume you are given tan (pi/6). This means sin (pi/6)/cos (pi/6). But my question is, if you are given sin (pi/6) or cos (pi/6), is it possible to derive the numerical value without using calculator?

-Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can derive these based on a unit circle triangle (don't remember exactly), but in the end you just have to memorize them anyways for use in trig.
 
Yeah, you just have to memorize that crap. You won't need a calculator
 
Or you can learn the expanded series notation(infinite series) and just start adding terms.
 
Better: Construct an equilateral triangle,with each side of length 2, then drop a perpendicular from the top to the base. That line bisects the angle and the opposite side. Since all three angles of an equilateral triangle are pi/3 radians (or 60 degrees), half of it is pi/6 (or 30 degrees) , while half the base has length 1, we have a right triangle with side opposite the pi/6 angle of length 1, hypotenuse of length 2 and side "near" the pi/6 angle of length (use the Pythagorean theorem) √(4- 1)= √(3).

sin(pi/6)= opposite/hypotenuse= 1/2.
cos(pi/6)= near/hypotenuse= √(3)/2.

tan(pi/6)= opposite/near= 1/√(3)= √(3)/3.
cotan(pi/6)= near/opposite= √(3)/1= √(3).

sec(pi/6)= hypotenuse/near= 2/√(3)= 2√(3)/3.
csc(pi/6)= hypotenuse/opposite= 2/1=2.

Of course, you can also use that to find the trig functions for pi/3, the other angle in the right triangle.
 
Thanks a lot, all I've to do is play around with the equations now, thanks Hal and guys.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top