Cosmology: Horizon of the universe

rabbit44
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is what the question says exactly:

Assume the universe today is flat with both matter and a cosmological constant but no radiation. Compute the horizon of the Universe as a function of \OmegaM and sketch it. (You will need a computer or calculator to do this).

Homework Equations


Friedmann Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


So I took the Friedmann Equation with k and the radiation density as 0 and solved it to find a(t). I got:

a = (\frac{\Omega_{\Lambda}}{\Omega_{M0}})^{-1/3}[sin(\frac{3H_{0}(\Omega_{M0})^{1/2}t}{2}]2/3

Latex takes ages so I don't really want to go through how I got there, but I'm pretty sure of it. Then I assumed the question is talking about the particle horizon rather than the event horizon. Either way I need to integrate 1 over this wrt t. Is this analytically possible, or is this the bit where I need a computer? The next part of the question asks me for the current horizon size if \Omega_{M0} = 1/3 and h=1/\sqrt{2}, where I think h is something to do with H0. Just in case that next part is a clue to what I need to do.

Thanks for any help people!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your on the right track. Though your scale factor seems to have one error in it: the \Omega_M^{1/2} in the argument for sin should actually be (\Omega_M-1)^{1/2}. (check out equation 6.26 in "Introduction to Cosmology" by Ryden)

Yes, just integrate over 1/a times the speed of light to get the particle horizon. It does look like doing a numerical integral on a computer would be easiest.

On the second part of the problem, the parameter h is the Hubble constant in units of 100 km/s/Mpc. So if h = 1/sqrt(2) then that means that H_0 ~ 70.7 km/s/Mpc.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top