Could Anti-Matter Really Be Stored and Contained for Experiments?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Syed Ammar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cern Isolation
Syed Ammar
Messages
25
Reaction score
1
Wikipedia says CERN has isolated about 38 atoms of antihydrogen and maintained them for over 15 minutes? ... Do you think that is possible?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CERN
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Whenever you find a claim on wikipedia that you want to verify, follow the sources it cites. That's what they are for.
Here, I've done it for you this time:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-13666892
http://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/v7/n7/full/nphys2025.html
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010Natur.468..673A

The last two articles are paywalled, though.

ArXiv has got a number of papers on the subject:
http://arxiv.org/find/all/1/all:+AND+Trapped+antihydrogen/0/1/0/all/0/1 (scroll down a bit)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks.
 
Syed Ammar said:
Wikipedia says CERN has isolated about 38 atoms of antihydrogen and maintained them for over 15 minutes? ... Do you think that is possible?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CERN

Why would it be impossible?
 
I thought that anti-matter couldn`t be stored inside things made of matter (its opposite) that`s why I thought it was impossible..?
 
Syed Ammar said:
I thought that anti-matter couldn`t be stored inside things made of matter (its opposite) that`s why I thought it was impossible..?

If you read the original report on CNN, the 38 atoms of anti-hydrogen were contained in a magnetic trap. These atoms were held in containment long enough for researchers to run experiments several hundred times.

It's not impossible to make anti-matter, given sufficient time and energy; the trick is to store the stuff and keep it from reacting with matter, which is why the magnetic trap is necessary.

http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/europe/11/18/switzerland.cern.antimatter/?hpt=Mid
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top