Coulomb's law electric field charge on y axis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving three charges positioned on the y-axis, specifically two negative charges (-q) at y = ±d and a positive charge (+2q) at y = 0. Participants express confusion about determining the electric field along the x-axis, questioning whether the problem is worded poorly. Clarification reveals that the +2q charge is fixed at y = 0, not variable along the x-axis, which helps in understanding the electric field's behavior. It is noted that the electric field at any point on the x-axis is influenced more by the closer +2q charge than by the two -q charges, leading to a net electric field that does not cancel out completely. The conversation concludes with the realization that the electric field along the x-axis is not zero due to this asymmetry in charge influence.
kirby2
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Is this question worded poorly or is it just me?

Three charges are on the y-axis. Charges -q are at y = ±d and charge + 2q is at y = 0.
(a) Determine the electric field E along the x-axis.
(b) Verify that your answers to part a has the expected behavior as x
becomes very small and very large.

what i don't get is that the charge on y=0 can be anywhere on the x-axis so i don't know how to get the field on the x-axis when i can place that charge anywhere. can someone verify if this question is legit?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kirby2 said:
Is this question worded poorly or is it just me?

Three charges are on the y-axis. Charges -q are at y = ±d and charge + 2q is at y = 0.
(a) Determine the electric field E along the x-axis.
(b) Verify that your answers to part a has the expected behavior as x
becomes very small and very large.

what i don't get is that the charge on y=0 can be anywhere on the x-axis so i don't know how to get the field on the x-axis when i can place that charge anywhere. can someone verify if this question is legit?
All three charges are along the y-axis.

The +2q charge also lies on the x-axis.

That places it at a very specific location.
 
you said "All three charges are along the y-axis.

The +2q charge also lies on the x-axis." why did you say "also"?
 
kirby2 said:
you said "All three charges are along the y-axis.

The +2q charge also lies on the x-axis." why did you say "also"?

Because you said in your original post:
"what i don't get is that the charge on y=0 can be anywhere on the x-axis ..."​
This indicated to me that you must have thought that the +2q charge, the on at y = 0, could be anywhere on the x-axis.
 
(3,0) and (0,0) are both at y=0 yet they are in two different places.
 
just kidding you are right. i didnt read the first part that the charges are "on the y axis"
 
ok, i don't know how to start. my initial thought is that E on the x-axis is zero. the three charges pull in the y direction. i can't see anything that would pull/push in the x-direction. is this right?
 
kirby2 said:
ok, i don't know how to start. my initial thought is that E on the x-axis is zero. the three charges pull in the y direction. i can't see anything that would pull/push in the x-direction. is this right?
At any location on the x-axis, let's say at x = a, the +2q charge is closer to the point x = a, than the two -q charges are. This means that at that location, the field due to the two negative charges is less than the field due tho the positive charges. Also, the electric field due to each of the two negative is not entirely in the x-direction. These two facts taken together tell us that the E field from the negative charges does not entirely cancel the E field from the positive charge.
 
Back
Top