Coulomb's Law Placement of Charges in Equilibrium

AI Thread Summary
A third positive charge cannot be placed between two point charges of equal magnitude but opposite sign (+Q and -Q) to achieve equilibrium, as the forces would not balance. Placing the charge to the left of the positive charge results in a stronger repulsive force, while positioning it to the right of the negative charge leads to a stronger attractive force. Additionally, placing the charge in between the two would result in forces acting in the same direction, preventing equilibrium. The only feasible position suggested is at infinity, but the consensus is that no stable location exists for equilibrium. Therefore, the answer to the original question is no, a third charge cannot be placed to achieve net zero force.
JSGandora
Messages
92
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the arrangement of two point charges equal in magnitude but opposite sign (+Q, and -Q), which are a fixed distance d apart. Can you find a location where a third positive charge
Q could be placed so that the net electric force on this charge is zero?


Homework Equations


Coulomb's Law


The Attempt at a Solution


The third charge obviously must be placed on the same line as the first two charges. Let the negative charge be to the right of the positive charge. If the third charge was to the left of the positive charge, the positive charge would repel the third charge with a greater magnitude than the negative charge would attract it, thus the third charge cannot be placed to the left of the positive charge.

If we placed the third charge to the right of the negative charge, the negative charge would attract it with greater magnitude than the positive charge would repel it thus it would also not be in equilibrium.

If the third charge was placed inbetween the two charges, the force by both charges would be in the same direction so the third charge would also not be in equilibrium.

The only logical answer for me is placing the third charge at a point at infinity. Is this the correct answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JSGandora said:
Can you find a location where a third positive charge
Q could be placed so that the net electric force on this charge is zero?

The only logical answer for me is placing the third charge at a point at infinity. Is this the correct answer?
Your reasoning is perfectly correct. But I would say that the best answer to the question (quoted above) is a simple "no".
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top