Covalent Bonding: Boron's 5 Valence Electrons

AI Thread Summary
Boron has three valence electrons available for bonding, despite having five total electrons, as two are core electrons not involved in bonding. It can form three covalent bonds with other atoms, including other boron atoms, but cannot form a single bond with three separate atoms simultaneously. The discussion highlights confusion about boron's bonding capabilities and the importance of understanding its valence electrons. Clarification is sought on how boron bonds with other elements. The conversation emphasizes the need for a solid grasp of boron's bonding behavior for further study.
kassandra
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
More questions lol.

Ive looked this up and still can't get a clear answer.

Lets say you have Boron...this atom has 5 valence electrons.

I know that it can just have 3 covalent bonds with one other atom of Boron like this:
:B
lll
B

But could it not just have a single convalent bond with three separate atoms of Boron or any other atom for that matter like this:
B
l
:B-B
l
B


or this:
Li
l
:B-H
l
Rb

or even this:
Be
ll
:B-H

I have an even more complicated questions but I need the answer to this one first lol.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
no B has 3 valence electrons, it is in Group IIIA (or 13). (It does have is 5 electrons but that includes 2 core electrons that are not involved in bonding)

Is your next problem trying to draw a Lewis structure of a boron compound?
 
No, just trying to figure out everything 100%
I only had one set of questions and they are done. Now were just going over the chapters and i don't want to get behind
 
well what is Boron bonding with?
If its previously stated then i apologize i was not paying attention
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top