Covariant Maxwell Equations in Materials

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the covariant Maxwell equations in materials, particularly one that correctly represents non-homogeneous Maxwell equations. The user has already derived one equation but seeks another, noting difficulties in locating resources like Landau's book and a problematic Wikipedia article. References to "Foundations of Electrodynamics" by P. Moon and D. E. Spencer are made, highlighting the complexity introduced by Lorentz Transformation on physical parameters. Another suggestion includes Post's "Formal Structure of Electromagnetics," with a caution that the user's equation may be specialized and overlooks aspects like spatial dispersion. The conversation emphasizes the challenges in accessing comprehensive literature on the topic.
EsPg
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,

I have this simple question. ¿Where can I find the covariant maxwell equations in materials?. I've already one and proved they correctly represent the non-homogene maxwell equations, is this one

\partial_{\nu}F^{\nu\mu}+\Pi^{\mu\nu}A_{\nu}=J^{\mu}_{libre}

with the tensor defined as

\Pi_{\mu\nu}&=\chi_e(\eta_{\mu\nu}\partial^2 -\partial^{\mu}\partial^{\mu})-\de{\chi_e+\frac{\chi_m}{1+\chi_m}}\eta_{\mu l}\eta_{\nu m}(\delta_{lm}\bigtriangledown^2-\partial_{l}\partial_{m})

I need the other one. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
¿Nobody? I've been checking Landau's book but i can't find them :'(. There's a Wikipedia article but it's all messed,maybe after this and on vacation I fix it.
 
They're described and analyzed here: "Foundations of Electrodynamics" by P. Moon and D. E. Spencer.

But the whole situation becomes extremely messy as most every physical parameter including permittivity and permeability becomes skewed due to the attempt to accommodate the Lorentz Transformation.
 
PhilDSP said:
They're described and analyzed here: "Foundations of Electrodynamics" by P. Moon and D. E. Spencer.

But the whole situation becomes extremely messy as most every physical parameter including permittivity and permeability becomes skewed due to the attempt to accommodate the Lorentz Transformation.

Thanks. The problem is that i haven't been able to check that book, it's neither in the library nor online. ¿Any other place?
 
You may be able to get some insight from Post's "Formal Structure of Electromagnetics".
 
I think the other one is identically equal to the equation in vacuo.
However, your equation does seem to be rather specialized. E.g. , a splitting into chi_e and chi_m seems only to be true in linear electrodynamics of non-chiral materials. Furthermore, it neglects spatial dispersion. All is discussed very well in the book of Landau.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top