Cradle to Cradle Ideas = Feasible Career Path

AI Thread Summary
A fourth-year college student majoring in physics expresses dissatisfaction with their current path, feeling a lack of creativity and production in their studies. Initially an architecture student, they shifted to physics after realizing a desire for a more technical and innovative approach to design, inspired by the book "Cradle to Cradle." Despite their interest in materials science and a potential career aligned with sustainable design, they feel it's too late to switch majors but are considering a minor. The discussion includes suggestions for pursuing a master's in engineering or exploring software development as a way to engage in design and production. The student is encouraged to consider taking programming classes to enhance their skill set, regardless of their ultimate career choice.
missfangula
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

How do I begin with this long and complicated story? I am a forth year college student majoring in physics. I began college as an architecture student, made some life-altering realizations during first year that it is not truly progress at all, just a rehashing of shapes/art school, was very dissatisfied and wanted to make something truly innovative that worked well following a technical background.

Ended up in physics because engineering did not seem to cover the basics thoroughly enough for me. Along the way, I read Cradle to Cradle by Michael Braungart and William McDonough. I fell in love with the concept; actually, I had developed my own design philosophy before I came across this wonderful book, and it pretty much matched theirs.

I am not happy with physics. It is fascinating, sure, but I feel a certain emptiness brought on by not producing anything anymore. I miss creating things. I miss having an idea in my head and seeing it grow to fruition by executing it.

It it too late in my program to switch majors again. So I will most likely graduate with a bachelor's degree in physics. I have room for a minor, though, if that means anything, or maybe nothing at all, just take it easy.

I would really like to follow a Cradle to Cradle path in my career, and design products, manufacturing processes, buildings, anything in that manner. I was thinking about materials science, but I am not really sure where to begin or what options are even available to me with a physics undergraduate degree.

I think in all reality I am the engineering type who never took the time to explore that side of me, and is not regretting it. I am also the creative type, and miss that very much.

What do you recommend I do?

Thank for any advice,
-miss fangula
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you try getting a master's in engineering?
 
I'm surprised you haven't gotten into software development.
 
Why would I want to go into software development?
How would the transition from physics to engineering work? Should I start taking a couple of classes in it now, or is that just a waste of time and money?

Thanks
 
Hi Miss Fangula,

I haven't read Cradle to Cradle, but from your post I got the idea that you are a person who likes to design and build things and see them all the way into production. In software development, you have the opportunity to design, build, test, and deploy. I just thought that might be something that you would find very satisfying. I know that I have enjoyed developing the (small) systems I have created, and seeing people use them, and knowing that I have made their jobs easier.

I think you would enjoy a programming class if you ever have the time to take one. It's a good thing to learn, no matter what you choose for future studies or a profession.
 
Last edited:
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top