Cross Section of Water Flowing Down Vertical Pipe: The Mystery Unveiled

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of water flowing through a vertical pipe of constant cross-section compared to natural waterfalls. It highlights that while fluid velocity increases and cross-section decreases in free-flow scenarios like waterfalls, this does not occur in a rigid pipe due to the conservation of mass and the incompressibility of water. The water in the pipe maintains a consistent mass flow rate, meaning that as gravity acts on it, the velocity does not increase in the same manner as it would in free fall. The conversation also touches on the pressure dynamics within the pipe, which prevent the water from behaving as it would in an open environment. Overall, the unique conditions of a rigid pipe create a different flow behavior than that observed in natural waterfalls.
R Power
Messages
270
Reaction score
0
hi
We all know when velocity of fluid increases then cross section decreases for same mass flow rate and this can be well seen at water flowing from a height as in waterfalls.
But why this doesn't happen when water flows down through a vertical held pipe of constant cross section. Well you may say that since cross section of pipe is constant so it's velocity will remain same but why then velocity doesn't increase due to gravity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi R Power! :smile:
R Power said:
hi
We all know when velocity of fluid increases then cross section decreases for same mass flow rate and this can be well seen at water flowing from a height as in waterfalls.
But why this doesn't happen when water flows down through a vertical held pipe of constant cross section. Well you may say that since cross section of pipe is constant so it's velocity will remain same but why then velocity doesn't increase due to gravity?

Because of conservation of mass (and incompressibility, ie constant density, of water) …

in steady flow, so long as the water fills the whole width of the pipe, the rate at which water enters one end of the pipe must equal the rate at which it leaves the other end. :wink:
 


It will not flow as fast as a stone dropped over the same vertical distance.
 


Because of conservation of mass (and incompressibility, ie constant density, of water) …
Mass flow rate will even remain same if velocity of water increases (due to gravity) and correspondingly cross sectional area of water within the pipe decreases.
 


R Power said:
hi
We all know when velocity of fluid increases then cross section decreases for same mass flow rate and this can be well seen at water flowing from a height as in waterfalls.
But why this doesn't happen when water flows down through a vertical held pipe of constant cross section. Well you may say that since cross section of pipe is constant so it's velocity will remain same but why then velocity doesn't increase due to gravity?

Can you give a physical example of such a flow?
 


Can you give a physical example of such a flow?
i already gave example - in waterfalls from mountains. You can also it yourself. Put water in a glass then empty the glass slowly(so that you can observe) by tilting it and see as water reaches more and more near ground it's cross section decreases and velocity increases due to gravity.
My question is why such thing does not happen in vertical pipes
 


It will not flow as fast as a stone dropped over the same vertical distance.
why?
 


R Power said:
i already gave example - in waterfalls from mountains. You can also it yourself. Put water in a glass then empty the glass slowly(so that you can observe) by tilting it and see as water reaches more and more near ground it's cross section decreases and velocity increases due to gravity.
My question is why such thing does not happen in vertical pipes
and "why"

You are suggesting that the water should leave the sides of the pipe as it falls and form a column inside? That would involve the formation of a space between liquid and pipe. This would constitute a low pressure region which will support the water below it in the pipe, delaying the fall. The water inside is not, in fact, in free fall, but affected by the pressure situation of the whole column (which communicates throughout at the speed of sound in the water).

Your model of a waterfall seems right but the situation in a rigid pipe is very different. Perhaps you'd see the effect in a pipe constructed so it could not actually stretch but could alter its diameter. That would be a good design task!
 
Back
Top