Cube and Sphere Period Comparison with Same Wire and Restoring Force Constant?

kevinf
Messages
89
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In the experiment, you will study an oscillator called a "torsion pendulum."
In this case, the restoring "force" is the torsion constant of the wire that
suspends the weight X and the inertial term is the rotational inertia of the
suspended mass. You will compare the periods of a suspended sphere and of a
suspended cube. The rotational inertia of a sphere is Is = 1/10M_sD^2 where
ms is the mass of the sphere and D is its diameter. The rotational inertia
of a cube is Ic = 1/6m_S^2 where mc is the mass of the cube and S is the
length of its side. If the cube and the sphere are suspended from the same
wire, what is the expected ratio of their periods, Tc/Ts?
Assume that D = S
ms = 0.20kg
and mc = 0.9 kg


Homework Equations



T=1/f, omega = 2pi*f

The Attempt at a Solution



so for this one I know that I can get the moment of inertia and get the
angular frequency but I don't know what the restoring force constant k is.
is that constant require or would it cancel out later on?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bump...
 
First work it out symbolically.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top