Current and magnetic field in a spherical capacitor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the magnetic field generated by a radial current distribution in a spherical capacitor. It is proposed that the magnetic flux is zero both inside and outside the capacitor due to the spherically symmetric nature of the current, which leads to the conclusion that no monopoles exist. The Biot-Savart law is referenced to support the idea that any magnetic flux created by the current is countered by an equal and opposite flux, resulting in a net magnetic field of zero. Participants clarify that while there is current between the capacitor plates, it does not produce any magnetic flux. The consensus is that the magnetic field remains absent in this configuration.
fabiogn
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
<< Mentor Note -- Thread moved from the technical forums,. so no HH Template is shown >>[/color]

Hello! I have a question on Electromagnetics.

Could anyone check if I am on the right track?
Here is the proposed problem:
Consider a spherically symmetric current distribution, which is radial and corresponds to the slow leak between the plates of a spherical capacitor. Considering now the magnetic flux B caused by this current, choose the right one:

Among the five alternatives there is one that affirms that the magnetic flux is zero outside and inside this capacitor because magnetic field lines never cross and always form closed paths.

Since I cannot figure out how the magnetic poles and field lines regarding the condition above described would be, (it would be like a monopole) I think that this alternative is the right one.

I also have found the text below, which reinforces my point of view:
"because since we have a completely spherically symmetric situation, it could only generate a spherically symmetric magnetic field. But the only possible such fields are one pointing outwards everywhere and one pointing inwards everywhere, both corresponding to non-existent monopoles. So, there can be no magnetic field" Has anyone seen this problem before? Am I right?

Many thanks in advance,
Best regards!
Fabio
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
We can also regard a miniscule current along the radius from one plate to the other. According to the Biot-Savart law, it creates the magnetic flux Bi. Then, we can easily find the opposite current to create -Bi. And, owing to the spherical symmetry, each elementary magnetic flux has its opposite flux. In the end, their total vector sum is 0.
 
Hi Irene, many thanks for your reply!

Let me see if I got it right... So, does it mean that internally there is magnetic flux between the two spherical surfaces of the capacitor?

I really appreciate your help.
 
There is current from one sphere to the other, but there is no flux. B = 0
 
Dear Irene,

Ok! I understood! Many thanks for your help!



Fabio
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top