Current density of rotating spherical shell

icelevistus
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Express the current density of a spherical shell of radius a, rotating with angular velocity omega, with surface charge density sigma



Delta function will be denoted d(x). Spherical coordinates will be used



I have concluded that for a given chunk (if we restrict to the 0<theta<pi/2 domain), the velocity will be given by v=a*Sin(theta)*(omega). It is clear that the current density will only have a phi component. I have concluded:

J_phi = (sigma)*a*Sin(theta)*(omega)*d(r'-a)

Where the delta function is used to restrict the current density to the sphere's surface.

Can anyone confirm that this reasoning is correct?






 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks good, except I see no reason for you to restrict theta to 0&lt;\theta&lt;\frac{\pi}{2}...what is wrong with your expression for the lower half of the sphere?
 
gabbagabbahey said:
It looks good, except I see no reason for you to restrict theta to 0&lt;\theta&lt;\frac{\pi}{2}...what is wrong with your expression for the lower half of the sphere?

you're right, as I was writing it I thought I was using cosine and it would introduce a sign error. Whole shell it is!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top