Current in a wire

  • #1
ravsterphysics
57
1

Homework Statement


1.JPG


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



I know I = nqvA

When the pd is applied the surface that is 8cm long, the cross sectional area is 32cm (8x4) but when the pd is applied across the 4cm side, the cross sectional area is now 16cm (4x4) so I has decreased by a factor of 2 so the new I is I/2 thus answer A? But the correct answer is D.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Simon Bridge
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
17,874
1,657
When comparing I=nqvA for each case, you assumed that only A changed. q stays the saem OK - but is v the same?
HInt: Ohms' law and resistivity.
 
  • Like
Likes ravsterphysics
  • #3
gneill
Mentor
20,945
2,886
You've got the order of the faces backwards. The initial scenario has the PD applied across the ends of the rectangle (the 4 x 4 ends are separated by 8 cm).

Also, remember that resistance is proportional to path length as well as being inversely proportional to the cross sectional area. Look up the definition of resistivity.
 
  • Like
Likes ravsterphysics
  • #4
stevendaryl
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
8,942
2,931

Homework Statement


View attachment 111643

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



I know I = nqvA

When the pd is applied the surface that is 8cm long, the cross sectional area is 32cm (8x4) but when the pd is applied across the 4cm side, the cross sectional area is now 16cm (4x4) so I has decreased by a factor of 2 so the new I is I/2 thus answer A? But the correct answer is D.

I think that the relevant equation is: [itex]R \propto \frac{l}{A}[/itex] where [itex]l[/itex] is the length of the resistor and [itex]A[/itex] is the cross-sectional area. Switching from one face to the other changes both [itex]A[/itex] and [itex]l[/itex].
 
  • Like
Likes ravsterphysics
  • #5
oz93666
174
29
People are always very quick to use formulas .... much easier just to look at it .....the distance the current has to travel has halved so this alone will make the resistance halve ... but in addition the area the current moves through has doubled .. this will also halve the resistance ... so in total the resistance has dropped to a quarter of what it was ...
 
  • Like
Likes ravsterphysics
  • #6
ravsterphysics
57
1
When comparing I=nqvA for each case, you assumed that only A changed. q stays the saem OK - but is v the same?
HInt: Ohms' law and resistivity.

You've got the order of the faces backwards. The initial scenario has the PD applied across the ends of the rectangle (the 4 x 4 ends are separated by 8 cm).

Also, remember that resistance is proportional to path length as well as being inversely proportional to the cross sectional area. Look up the definition of resistivity.

I think that the relevant equation is: [itex]R \propto \frac{l}{A}[/itex] where [itex]l[/itex] is the length of the resistor and [itex]A[/itex] is the cross-sectional area. Switching from one face to the other changes both [itex]A[/itex] and [itex]l[/itex].

People are always very quick to use formulas .... much easier just to look at it .....the distance the current has to travel has halved so this alone will make the resistance halve ... but in addition the area the current moves through has doubled .. this will also halve the resistance ... so in total the resistance has dropped to a quarter of what it was ...

Yep, I totally disregarded the effects on the wire's resistance. It's clear now why current goes up by a factor of 4. thanks for the help.
 
  • Like
Likes Simon Bridge

Suggested for: Current in a wire

  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
309
Replies
5
Views
223
Replies
2
Views
359
Replies
12
Views
374
Replies
8
Views
360
Replies
43
Views
700
Replies
4
Views
205
Replies
12
Views
490
Replies
6
Views
484
Top