Current of Phasor going in CCW direction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the correct representation of a current phasor rotating counterclockwise (CCW) in the equation vo(t). A participant questions whether the current should be expressed as -5cos(10t - 45) instead of 5cos(10t - 45) due to its CCW direction. It is clarified that inverting the amplitude corresponds to a 180-degree phase shift, but to change the rotation direction, a negative sign must be applied differently in the equation. The conversation emphasizes understanding how each term in the equation influences the function's behavior. Ultimately, the correct approach to represent the phasor's direction is crucial for accurate analysis.
smstepanic
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I feel I have solved this problem correctly (solving for vo(t)), however since the current is going in the ccw direction, would this make the current -5cos(10t - 45) versus 5 cos(10t -45)? This may be a simple question, so I am just making sure. Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • current.jpg
    current.jpg
    21.8 KB · Views: 494
Engineering news on Phys.org
smstepanic said:
Hi,

I feel I have solved this problem correctly (solving for vo(t)), however since the current is going in the ccw direction, would this make the current -5cos(10t - 45) versus 5 cos(10t -45)? This may be a simple question, so I am just making sure. Thanks!
Inverting the amplitude is the same as adding a 180-degree phase shift. To make the rotation direction different, you need a negative sign in a different place...
 
  • Like
Likes smstepanic
berkeman said:
Inverting the amplitude is the same as adding a 180-degree phase shift. To make the rotation direction different, you need a negative sign in a different place...

I think I understand. A 180 degree phase shift would apply to the -45 degrees. So 5cos(10t + 135)?
 
smstepanic said:
I think I understand. A 180 degree phase shift would apply to the -45 degrees. So 5cos(10t + 135)?
Um, no, that's not what I meant.

Regardless of the problem you posted, if you want the phasor to rotate in the opposite direction, you need to multiply by -1 where in the equation? Think about how each term in the equation affects the function...
 
  • Like
Likes smstepanic
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top