Curvature forumula of a planar trajectory

Rhawk187
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://steam.cs.ohio.edu/~cmourning/problem1.jpg

If the image doesn't load (and it might not, although I'm not sure why), it can be found at:

http://steam.cs.ohio.edu/~cmourning/problem1.jpg

Homework Equations



Part of the problem is I'm not entirely sure what all the relevant equations are. This is a planar trajectory so the torsion is 0, so I've just included the first two Frenet-Serret equations at:

http://steam.cs.ohio.edu/~cmourning/equations1.pdf

The Attempt at a Solution



It is rather complicated equationally, so I felt more comfortable typing it in something other than this, you can find the work at:

http://steam.cs.ohio.edu/~cmourning/physics1.pdf

If I should put this somewhere else on the forums let me know, this is my first time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Just call the curve parameter s=x. Then the curve is (x,y(x)). The tangent vector is (1,y'(x)). That makes the normalized tangent T=(1,y'(x))/(1+y'(x)^2)^(1/2). Now kappa=|dT/dx|. You have that in your solution. You have to find the vector that is dT/dx and find it's magnitude. Start differentiating.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top