Finding the expectation value of energy using wavefunc. and eigenstate

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the expectation value of energy using wave functions and eigenstates in quantum mechanics. Participants are addressing specific parts of a homework problem, including verifying calculations and seeking hints for completing the final part.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster seeks confirmation on their solution for part (a) and hints for part (c). Some participants question discrepancies in results and explore the implications of probability distributions related to wave functions.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with each other's work, with some providing feedback and hints. There is a recognition of differing results, and one participant reports resolving their confusion regarding part (c), indicating a productive exchange.

Contextual Notes

There are references to specific expressions and factors in the problem that are under discussion, including the need to reconcile different results and the use of provided equations. The original poster expresses uncertainty about their calculations and the implications of certain factors in their solutions.

Dixanadu
Messages
250
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Hey guys!

So this is a bit of a long question, I've done most of it but I need a few tips to finish the last part, and I'm not sure if I've done the first one correctly. I'll be typing it up in Word cos Latex is long!

http://imageshack.com/a/img5/8335/n7iw.jpg


Homework Equations



http://imageshack.com/a/img820/2584/viiw.jpg

The Attempt at a Solution


http://imageshack.com/a/img534/1410/lbv9.jpg

Please let me know if I've done part (a) right and a bit of a hint with part C. Thanks guys!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello.

Your work looks pretty good. For part (a) I get a result that differs from yours by a factor of 2.

For part (b), the high probability for ##P_1## should not be too surprising if you graph the state ##\Psi(x,0)## and compare it to the graph of ##\psi_1(x)##.

For (c), there is an expression in the "stuff we need" that you can use.
 
Okay, I don't know why your answer differs by a factor of 2 for part (a). Unless I've made a serious mistake I don't see how.

Second, for part (c), I have no idea what to do. If I use the expression of <E> in terms of the sum of probabilites in the "stuff we need" section, I still have a factor of E_n on the RHS, don't know how to get rid of it...
 
Oh don't worry about it TSny! I managed to figure it out. You were right, as always :D thanks for the help! I got the same answer for part (c) as you did for part (a).
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K