Cyclic Abelian Groups: True for All Cases?

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnnyboy2005
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cyclic
johnnyboy2005
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
is this true for all cases? i know something can be abelian and not cyclic. thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not true, as you say: some can be abelian but not cyclic. So cyclic implies abelian but not necessarily the other way arround.
 
johnnyboy2005 said:
is this true for all cases? i know something can be abelian and not cyclic. thanks

do you perhaps mean implies instead of =?
 
yes. other wise my question answers itself. so cyclic implies abelian. thanks for the help.
 
you have proved this (elementary in the sense of asked on the first examples sheet of any course in group theory if at all) result...
 
I love this property.

You work with cyclic groups so often that it's so nice to have them all abelian. I love it. :)
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...
Back
Top