Darwin and relativistic kinetic energy correction for hydrogen

kraigandrews
Messages
105
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Combine the Darwin correction with the relativistic kinetic energy correction for l=0 to show that the fine structure formula:

\DeltaE_{fs}= - \frac{(E^{(0)2}_{n})}{2mc^{2}}[\frac{4n}{j + 1/2}-3]

remains valid for l=0

Homework Equations



From a previous problem the Darwin hamiltionian is shown to affected only under s-states
where for any s-state the formula \frac{2}{na^{3/2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{4\pi}}

The Attempt at a Solution



so I know for s-states j=1/2 and l=0 (obviously). Overall, I am unsure as to what to show here, meaing:

do I combine the correction for the darwin energy to the correctionn for kinetic energy and then just show that for l=0, j=1/2 the equation still remains valid?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top