DC Transient RL Circuit - Current Decay

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating current decay in a DC transient RL circuit using the equation for current rise. The user seeks to adapt the equation for decay, starting from a specified current and applying a negative voltage to accelerate the decay process. It is noted that the equation can be applied symmetrically for both rise and decay, provided the time constant τ is calculated correctly as τ = L/R. Concerns are raised about discrepancies between theoretical calculations and simulation results, particularly regarding the speed of decay. The conversation concludes that for non-step transient inputs, solving the general differential equation may be necessary for accurate results.
LADransfield
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
If I have a circuit with

R = 1Ω
L = 300μH
V = 20V
i0 = 5A

I know that I can use the equation at the bottom of page 13 to calculate the current rise given any starting current and input voltage:

i(t) = (V/R)[1-e-t/τ] + i0e-t/τ

This is fine, and stops increasing at 20A as expected, but then how would I (if I need to) arrange the equation so that it works in a similar way for decay? Say I was starting at a current of 15A, with a driving voltage of 10V?

I know that if I use:

i(t) = (V/R)[e-t/τ]

I will start decaying at 10A down to 0A, but I'm interested in being able to specify a negative voltage to drive the decay faster, with a variable starting current.

Thanks in advance for any advice!

*edit*
Also, how would I work out when it is best to switch between building and decaying current? Would it just be when |V/R| > |i(t)| is less than 0, I build, and when |V/R| < |i(t)| I decay?

Thanks again
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I don't understand the problem. That equation appears to work regardless of "rise" or "decay", and regardless of what types of inputs you use (provided they are not dynamic).
 
I have been using transient inputs, though every time my input changes, I have resent my t back to 0 and begun recounting, so the dynamic input shouldn't be a problem

Compared to simulation from ANSYS Maxwell and from test data, this appears to be calculating results which decay much slower, though rise appears relatively similar
 
The equation definitely doesn't have any differences between rise/fall times, it is inherently symmetric. The only thing I can think of is that perhaps you are calculating τ incorrectly? It should be τ = L/R.

This equation will work fine for multiple step transients provided it has time to fully settle before applying the next one. If you are trying to calculate transients that are something other than step changes, you will want to solve the general differential equation.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top