Installing Microsoft Office on multiple devices is restricted by licensing agreements, which typically allow software to be used on only one computer. This limitation has frustrated users, particularly students who find the costs prohibitive. Alternatives like OpenOffice and MikTeX are being considered by some users, highlighting a shift towards free software solutions. Discussions reveal dissatisfaction with Microsoft’s pricing, perceived monopolistic practices, and the inconvenience of transferring files between different programs. Users express a desire for more flexibility in software licensing, suggesting that a user-based rather than device-based licensing model could be more equitable. The conversation also touches on the historical context of Microsoft’s development and its competitive practices, with some users advocating for open-source solutions as viable alternatives to Microsoft products. Overall, the thread reflects a broader concern about software accessibility and the impact of corporate policies on individual users.
