Estimating K$^+$ Decay Ratios Without Mass Dependence

  • Thread starter Thread starter GoodKopp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay Ratios
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on estimating the decay rate ratio for K^+ decaying into e^+ ν_e versus K^+ decaying into μ^+ ν_μ. The relevant equation used is Fermi's Golden Rule, which relates decay width to the matrix element and phase space density. The provided decay rates from the Particle Data Group show a significant difference, with K^+ → μ^+ ν_μ being much more probable than K^+ → e^+ ν_e. Participants discuss the importance of including mass dependence in the calculations, particularly due to the weak interaction's influence on decay processes. The conversation emphasizes the need for a thorough understanding of the underlying physics to accurately estimate the decay ratios.
GoodKopp
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Give a simple estimate of the ratio of decay rates for K^+ \rightarrow e^+ \nu_e / K^+ \rightarrow \mu^+ \nu_\mu.

Homework Equations



Fermi's Golden Rule for decay width \Gamma = \hbar W = 2\pi (dn/dE_f)|M_{if}|^2.

For comparison, from the PDG, \Gamma / \Gamma_i are 1.55 \pm 0.07 \times 10^{-5} and 63.44 \pm 0.14 for K^+ \rightarrow e^+ \nu_e and K^+ \rightarrow \mu^+ \nu_\mu, respectively.

The Attempt at a Solution



\frac{\Gamma (K^+ \rightarrow e^+ \nu_e)}{\Gamma (K^+ \rightarrow \mu^+ \nu_\mu)} = \frac{\frac{dn}{dE} e^+ \nu_e}{\frac{dn}{dE} \mu^+ \nu_\mu}

\frac{dn}{dE} = \frac{dn}{dp} \frac{dp}{dE}

Am I going about this the right way? Where do I go from here?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to include a very strong dependence on the e or mu mass.
This comes from the weak interaction.
The same factor comes up in pi decay.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...

Similar threads

Back
Top