Decreasing Function: Understanding Why g is Decreasing at x=2 and x=-2

AI Thread Summary
The function g is decreasing between the points x = -2 and x = 2 because its derivative is negative in that interval. While the derivative at x = -2 and x = 2 is zero, indicating potential local extrema, the function's overall behavior is determined by the intervals where the derivative is negative. The first derivative test confirms that if the derivative is negative throughout an interval, the function decreases across that interval. The confusion arises from the distinction between open and closed intervals in calculus, where the endpoints may not be included in the decreasing behavior. Understanding these concepts clarifies why g is considered decreasing between -2 and 2, despite the derivative being zero at the endpoints.
UrbanXrisis
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
1
the question is http://home.earthlink.net/~urban-xrisis/clip_image002.jpg

The answer is A but I don't understand why the function g would be decreasing when x=2 and x=-2
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer states between -2 and 2 not only when x=2 or x=-2. The function is decreasing because its derivative is negative. Where a derivative is negative the function is decreasing, where a derivative is positive the function is increasing. Think of your derivative as a slope, a negative slope means your function goes down from left to right(decreasing), and a positive slope means your function goes up from left to right(increasing).
 
no, it states between -2 and 2 AND when they are equal. why?
 
-2 \underline{<}x\underline{<}2
is different from:
-2 < x < 2

why would the slope be decreasing at x=-2 and x=2 when the derivative is zero?
 
I misunderstood your question sorry about that.The first derivative test(straight from a calc book) states:

"Suppose that f is continuous at each point of the closed interval [a,b] and differentiable at each point of its interior (a,b). if f'>0 at each point of *(a,b), then f increases throughout *[a,b].if f'<0 at each point of (a,b), then f decreases throughout [a,b]."

*notice that they are using () meaning not including endpoints, however, after they use[] which means that the whole interval is increasing including the end points, this is by definition. As to why I don't remember right now, the calc book isn't helping much either, but I'm pretty sure the definition is right.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top