Defense of pilot wave theory against Motl

Ilja
Messages
676
Reaction score
83
I remember somewhere (don't remember where) Motl's attack against pilot wave theory has been mentioned.

Here is my rebuttal: http://ilja-schmelzer.de/realism/Motl.php"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I liked your "If there is a simple way to do the things, use it". Simplifying physics is no easy task, especially for smart people who are rapid at learning complicated physics.

Regards,
Arjen
 
ArjenDijksman said:
Simplifying physics is no easy task, especially for smart people who are rapid at learning complicated physics.
This is an excellent observation.
For brilliant physicists who fail to see the advantage of the Bohmian interpretation I often say something similar:
They are too clever to see the obvious.
 
we could simplify things but ignoring mathematical rigour ;D
 
zetafunction said:
we could simplify things but ignoring mathematical rigour ;D
But it is way better if we simplify things and improve rigour. A simple example is to stop considering quantum particles as point objects while they are in fact better represented by vectors, mathematical objects with spatial extension. So by considering quantum particles as arrow-like objects, we gain in physical and hence mathematical rigour.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top