Definition of efficiency of a thermodynamic cycle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on defining the efficiency of a thermodynamic cycle, particularly in the context of heat engines. It highlights the conventional efficiency formula, η = |W|/Qin, where net work is crucial. An alternative formula, η = |Wout|/(Qin + Win), is proposed but deemed less applicable to heat engines since it could misrepresent their efficiency. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using net work to accurately assess the conversion of heat into work. The participants ultimately agree on the significance of the conventional definition in thermodynamic analysis.
greypilgrim
Messages
579
Reaction score
44
Hi.

Sorting the exchanges of heat and mechanical work in a thermodynamic cycle by the signs and summarizing, I get
##Q_{in}>0##: heat transferred into the system
##Q_{out}<0##: heat transferred to the cold reservoir
##W_{out}<0##: work done by the system
##W_{in}>0##: work done on the system (e.g. by moving back a piston)

The net work is ##W=W_{out}+W_{in}<0## (if it's a heat engine).
Normally, the efficiency is defined by
$$\eta=\frac{|W|}{Q_{in}}=\frac{|W_{out}+W_{in}|}{Q_{in}}\enspace .$$

But wouldn't it be more reasonable to use
$$\eta=\frac{|W_{out}|}{Q_{in}+W_{in}}\enspace ,$$
i.e. only the work actually done by the system divided by all energy put into the system?
 
Science news on Phys.org
usually when we talk about heat engine, it gets all the energy needed in the form of heat, so the formula η= W/Qin is used, but in your case i think that the formula that you gave should be used.(i'm not sure)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
mehul mahajan said:
but in your case i think that the formula that you gave should be used.(i'm not sure)
That's not correct. The numerator is always taken as net work.

greypilgrim said:
But wouldn't it be more reasonable to use
η=|Wout|Qin+Win,​
\eta=\frac{|W_{out}|}{Q_{in}+W_{in}}\enspace ,
i.e. only the work actually done by the system divided by all energy put into the system?
While this makes sense in the overall concept of efficiency, it doesn't work very well when applied to heat engines, where one is mostly concerned by their ability to convert heat into work. Using your definition, a transmission belt could be seen as a heat engine with an efficiency of almost unity. Taking net work divided by input heat allows to concentrate on the conversion process.
 
Last edited:
DrClaude said:
Indeed, most often Win=0W_\mathrm{in} = 0, so both forms would be equivalent.
I'm not sure if we are talking about different things, but I can't think of a single case where this is true. Every compression of a gas (which is present in virtually any thermodynamic cycle) is work done on the gas.

Only because ##W=W_{out}+W_{in}## has a negative part ##W_{out}<0## and a positive part ##W_{in}>0##, its absolute value ##|W|## corresponds to the area enclosed by the cycle in the PV diagram.
 
greypilgrim said:
I'm not sure if we are talking about different things, but I can't think of a single case where this is true. Every compression of a gas (which is present in virtually any thermodynamic cycle) is work done on the gas.
I completely misspoke. I have corrected my post.
 
I was watching a Khan Academy video on entropy called: Reconciling thermodynamic and state definitions of entropy. So in the video it says: Let's say I have a container. And in that container, I have gas particles and they're bouncing around like gas particles tend to do, creating some pressure on the container of a certain volume. And let's say I have n particles. Now, each of these particles could be in x different states. Now, if each of them can be in x different states, how many total...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top