Degrees of Freedom & Constraints of Pulley & Spring System

  • Thread starter Thread starter ShayanJ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulleys Spring
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the degrees of freedom and constraints in a pulley and spring system. It identifies two degrees of freedom: the angular rotation of the upper pulley and the angular rotation of the lower pulley. These rotations influence the spring's stretch and the movements of the attached masses. The constraints include the constancy of rope lengths and the relationship between angular velocities and mass velocities. The participants express clarity on the system's dynamics and appreciate the insights shared.
ShayanJ
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
2,801
Reaction score
606
Consider the system shown in the picture.
http://updata.ir/images/m9wcnahubdfanhq9edok.jpg
What are its degrees of freedom?
And is the Lagrangian below,the correct one for this system?
<br /> \mathfrak{L}=\frac{1}{2} M_2 \dot{x}^2+\frac{1}{2}m_1\dot{x}_1^2+\frac{1}{2}m_2\dot{x}_2^2+\frac{1}{2}I_1\omega_1^2+\frac{1}{2}I_2\omega_2^2-\frac{1}{2}kx^2+M_2gx+m_1g(x+x_1)+m_2g(x+x_2)<br />
Where x is the distance from the center of the lower pulley to the static platform that the spring is connected to directly and x_1 and x_2 are the distances from masses to the center of the lower pulley and the Is are the moments of inertia of the pulleys and I have taken the lower platform to be the zero point for gravitational potential energy.
What are the constraints?
I can think of the constancy of the length of ropes and the relation between \omegas and the velocity of masses.But I have problem finding the relation between the change of length in the spring and the distance from the lower platform to the center of the lower pulley and I just assumed that they're equal.
Any idea is welcome.
Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Shyan,

I see only two degrees of freedom in the figure (adequate for establishing all the required features of the kinematics): The angular rotation of the upper pulley (as a function of time) and the angular rotation of the lower pulley (as a function of time).

The angular rotation of the upper pulley determines the amount of stretch of the spring, and it also determines how far down the center of the lower pulley moves.

The angular rotation of the lower pulley determines how far mass 1 moves downward and how far mass 2 moves upward relative to the center of the lower pulley.

I hope this helps.

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
Hi Shyan,

I see only two degrees of freedom in the figure (adequate for establishing all the required features of the kinematics): The angular rotation of the upper pulley (as a function of time) and the angular rotation of the lower pulley (as a function of time).

The angular rotation of the upper pulley determines the amount of stretch of the spring, and it also determines how far down the center of the lower pulley moves.

The angular rotation of the lower pulley determines how far mass 1 moves downward and how far mass 2 moves upward relative to the center of the lower pulley.

I hope this helps.

Chet


Hi chet
Yeah,it was helpful...and after reading it,I was like: " Oohhh...Of course! "...I should have noticed it.But I think I was a little confused.
Thanks
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top