Derivation of boiling an egg formula using laplace transformation

crazystuff
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have been set a challenge to derive the formula for boiling a “perfect” soft-boiled egg, (essentially a thermal diffusion equation), in terms of the mass of the egg, the specific heat capacity and thermal conductivity of an egg, the initial temperature of the egg and the temperature of the boiling water using Laplace Transformation. Is it even possible, if so, is it published anywhere or does anyone know someone who has succeeded so that I can work through it?

I have done a lot of background reading about the materials and make up of an egg and the transfer of heat and energy. I have done my introduction, but unfortunately I am not very good at mathematics. Therefore I have taught myself the Laplace transformation, but now I am completely stuck. Can anyone point me in the right direction please or is there anyone else I can contact who might be able to help me. I would be very grateful for any help given to me on this challenging subject.

Many Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what asumptions are you making? the mass of the egg is evenly distributed through out the egg? or are you seperating the yoke? is this egg spherical?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top