Derivative of e^(x^x) with respect to x

  • Thread starter Thread starter labinojha
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative
labinojha
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Derivative of e^(x^x) with respect to x

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Computed using wolframalpha. I have attached the image . Would anyone explain to me the part I have highlighted with the blue box.
 

Attachments

  • wolframalpha-20110805035635275.gif
    wolframalpha-20110805035635275.gif
    18 KB · Views: 511
Physics news on Phys.org
imagine that at first, you don't realize that both of the variables are x, so then you have an equation like this: u^v So then, he calculates the total derivative of this equation in a general way, then at the end he replaces u by x and v by x.

Edit: ha, I'm talking about wolfram as a 'he'. Also, there is another way to solve this.
 
Last edited:
hi labinojha! :smile:

this is the partial derivative version of the https://www.physicsforums.com/library.php?do=view_item&itemid=353"

if a depends on b_1,\cdots b_n, and b_1,\cdots b_n depend only on c, then:

\frac{da}{dc}\ =\ \frac{\partial a}{\partial b_1}\frac{db_1}{dc}\ +\ \cdots \frac{\partial a}{\partial b_n}\frac{db_n}{dc}\ =\ (\mathbf{\nabla_b}\,a)\cdot \frac{d\mathbf{b}}{dc}​

in your case, a is xx, b1 and b2 are u and v,

and so a is a function a(u,v) of two variables, and we need to apply the chain rule to each variable separately

(btw, easier would be to say xx = exln(x) :wink:)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
\frac{\partial}{\partial x}u^{v}=\frac{\partial}{\partial x}u^{v}.\frac{\partial}{\partial x}u+\frac{\partial}{\partial x}u^{v}.\frac{\partial}{\partial x}v

Can i get any reason or possibly a derivation for this ?

Hi tiny-tim!
I had been writing so your answer came before I questioned. :)

http://www.ucl.ac.uk/Mathematics/geomath/level2/pdiff/pd10.html
 
Last edited:
Hi Bruce!
The other way i used to do it was to take the natural logarithm of both the sides(one side of the equation being y to suppose it as the function) two times in a row and then differentiating them both sides .

Is this what you were talking about ? :)
 
Last edited:
I was talking about the thing tiny-tim said:
x^x = e^{xln(x)}
But yes, the other way you do it is right as well. I guess there are several equivalent ways to do this problem.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top