Derivative of Planck's spectral distribution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on estimating the solution for a/λ after differentiating Planck's spectral distribution and setting it to zero. Participants suggest using a graphical approach due to the complexity of finding an analytical solution. One user expresses confusion about how to proceed graphically and seeks assistance. Another participant recommends examining the intersection of a line and an exponential function as a potential method for visualization. The conversation highlights the challenges of graphical estimation in the context of Planck's distribution.
CricK0es
Messages
54
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


From differentiating Planck's distribution and setting it equal to 0 I've reached the equation below. But now I'm asked to estimate the solution for a/λ. It's suggested that we try to do it graphically/trial and error as it's tricky to do analytically.

I'm wondering how I would go about doing it graphically; I feel like I'm missing something...

Any help would be appreciated, many thanks

Homework Equations


http://www.sciweavers.org/upload/Tex2Img_1488126559/render.png

a = hc/KbT

The Attempt at a Solution



I did try rearranging to get it in the form:

http://www.sciweavers.org/upload/Tex2Img_1488126973/render.png , But again I'm unsure how I can obtain something useful (graphically I mean)
[/B]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
CricK0es said:

Homework Statement


From differentiating Planck's distribution and setting it equal to 0 I've reached the equation below. But now I'm asked to estimate the solution for a/λ. It's suggested that we try to do it graphically/trial and error as it's tricky to do analytically.

I'm wondering how I would go about doing it graphically; I feel like I'm missing something...

Any help would be appreciated, many thanks

Homework Equations


http://www.sciweavers.org/upload/Tex2Img_1488126559/render.png

a = hc/KbT

The Attempt at a Solution



I did try rearranging to get it in the form:

http://www.sciweavers.org/upload/Tex2Img_1488126973/render.png , But again I'm unsure how I can obtain something useful (graphically I mean) [/B]

What about looking at the intersection of a line and an exponential?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes CricK0es
Ohhh... I see. Thank you
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top