Derivative of y = cos(a^3 + x^3)

  • Thread starter Thread starter illjazz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the derivative of the function y = cos(a^3 + x^3), focusing on the application of the chain rule and power rule in calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the chain rule and question the treatment of constants in differentiation. There is confusion regarding the terms that should be included in the derivative, particularly concerning the constant a.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the derivative process and the role of constants, while others express confusion about notation and the implications of the chain rule. Multiple interpretations of the derivative's components are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of differing preferences for notation in calculus, particularly between Leibniz notation and function notation, which may affect understanding. Participants also note the importance of recognizing constants in the differentiation process.

illjazz
Messages
59
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the derivative of the function y = cos(a^3 + x^3).


Homework Equations


- Chain rule
- Power rule


The Attempt at a Solution


This is driving me insane.. so here's what I have.

y = cos(a^3 + x^3)

y' = -sin(a^3 + x^3) * d/dx (a^3 + x^3)

y' = -sin(a^3 + x^3) * (3a^2 + 3x^2

y' = -(3a^2)(sin(a^3 + x^3)) - (3x^2)(sin(a^3 + x^3))

I would like to think that that's where this ends.. but my book claims the result is

y' = -(3x^2)(sin(a^3 + x^3))

How? Where the heck does that entire -(3a^2)(sin(a^3 + x^3)) term go!?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hence, dy/dx not dy/dx + dy/da!
 
rocomath said:
Hence, dy/dx not dy/dx + dy/da!

Ah! Ok that makes sense on an intuitive level.. can you expand that a bit though? Does a simply turn into 0 and thus kill that whole term containing a as a factor?

Thanks!

Edit:
By the way.. I stay far, far away from the dy/dx notation wherever possible. I just don't quite understand it.. for instance, I cringe when I see this in my book:

\frac{dy}{dx}=\frac{\frac{dy}{dt}}{\frac{dx}{dt}}

if

\frac{dx}{dt}\neq0

for example.. I much prefer something like

F'(x) = f'(g(x)) * g'(x).

Granted, the two examples are not equivalent for the purposes of comparison.. but it gets the point across. I suppose that explains why Leibnitz' notation throws me off :/
 
Last edited:
y'=\frac{dy}{dx}

Means to take the derivative of y with respects to x. Basically, only take the derivative of terms that include x.

y=ax+a

You could easily mistake this as product rule, but it's not! (but you could if you wanted to) Anything that does not have an x variable associated with it, is a constant.

\frac{dy}{dx}=a

or product rule (pointless)

\frac{dy}{dx}=a\frac{dy}{dx}x+x\frac{dy}{dx}a+\frac{dy}{dx}a=a\cdot1+x\cdot0+0=a

y'=\frac{dy}{dt}

Simply means to take the derivative of y with respects to t or time. You can use any variable you want.
 
illjazz said:

Homework Statement


Find the derivative of the function y = cos(a^3 + x^3).


Homework Equations


- Chain rule
- Power rule


The Attempt at a Solution


This is driving me insane.. so here's what I have.

y = cos(a^3 + x^3)

y' = -sin(a^3 + x^3) * d/dx (a^3 + x^3)

y' = -sin(a^3 + x^3) * (3a^2 + 3x^2)
No. d/dx(a^3+ x^3)= 3x^2. a^3 is a constant

y' = -(3a^2)(sin(a^3 + x^3)) - (3x^2)(sin(a^3 + x^3))

I would like to think that that's where this ends.. but my book claims the result is

y' = -(3x^2)(sin(a^3 + x^3))

How? Where the heck does that entire -(3a^2)(sin(a^3 + x^3)) term go!?
 
Sweet, that definitely helps :)

While we're here.. is it against the rules or anything to ask a second question about a new problem in the same thread? Seems like a bit of a waste to start a new thread just for this next one..

Here goes. If this is bad and frowned upon, let me know! (I understand, obviously, that as a general rule you don't want to do this.. but this one's so short I figure "what the hell"):

y=xe^{-x^2}

I know the solution already, of course, but I'd appreciate a step by step "walkthrough".

I got as far as this:

<br /> y=xe^{-x^2}<br />

<br /> y&#039;=x\frac{d}{dx}e^{-x^2}+e^{-x^2}\frac{d}{dx}x<br />

<br /> =xe^{-x^2}+e^{-x^2}<br />

Also, can someone tell me why I can't seem to make a new line when writing tex? "\\" is supposed to do it.. but does not :/

Oh btw.. the reason for the last step above was the assumption that the following is true:

<br /> \frac{d}{dx}e^x=e^x
 
\frac{d}{dx}e^x=e^x is true because the derivative of x is 1 (by power rule = derivative of x is 1 * x^(1-1)). If, in place of x, there was a function based on x (for example, 2x + 1), you would have e^(2x+1) multiplied by the derivative of the function, resulting in 2e^(2x+1) by the Chain Rule.

Having said that, there is a flaw in your walkthrough. The derivative of e^(-x^2) would be, by the combination of the Chain Rule and the Power Rule, would be -2xe^(-x^2). Hence, your final answer should come out to -2x^{2}e^{-x^2}+e^{-x^2}.
 
illjazz said:
Sweet, that definitely helps :)

While we're here.. is it against the rules or anything to ask a second question about a new problem in the same thread? Seems like a bit of a waste to start a new thread just for this next one..
It's not "against the rules", but many people will not look at a thread when they know the initial question has been answered- so you may be ruducing the number of people who see your new question.

Here goes. If this is bad and frowned upon, let me know! (I understand, obviously, that as a general rule you don't want to do this.. but this one's so short I figure "what the hell"):

y=xe^{-x^2}

I know the solution already, of course, but I'd appreciate a step by step "walkthrough".

I got as far as this:

<br /> y=xe^{-x^2}<br />

<br /> y&#039;=x\frac{d}{dx}e^{-x^2}+e^{-x^2}\frac{d}{dx}x<br />

<br /> =xe^{-x^2}+e^{-x^2}<br />

Also, can someone tell me why I can't seem to make a new line when writing tex? "\\" is supposed to do it.. but does not :/

Oh btw.. the reason for the last step above was the assumption that the following is true:

<br /> \frac{d}{dx}e^x=e^x
Yes, that last line is true. But it is NOT true that
{d e^{x^2}}{dx}= e^{-x^2}
You forgot the chain rule: multiply by the derivative of -x2.
 
Hello there:

Here is my solution, which matches your textbook's.

y = \cos(a^3 + x^3)

Let: u = a^3 + x^3

The Chain Rule: h&#039;(x) = f&#039;(g(x)) \times g&#039;(x)

Breaking the original equation down:

f(x) = \cos u, f&#039;(x) = -\sin u

g(x) = u = a^3 + x^3, g&#039;(x) = 3x^2 (From the Product Rule)

Note: 3a^2 is actually a constant due to the term a. Recall that the derivative of any constant is 0.)

Compiling each function:

h&#039;(x) = f&#039;(g(x)) \times g&#039;(x)

h&#039;(x) = f&#039;(u) x 3x^2

h&#039;(x) = -\sin(a^3 + x^3)(3x^2)

h&#039;(x) = -3x^2 \sin(a^3 + x^3)

Hope this helps.
 
  • #10
kylera said:
\frac{d}{dx}e^x=e^x is true because the derivative of x is 1 (by power rule = derivative of x is 1 * x^(1-1)). If, in place of x, there was a function based on x (for example, 2x + 1), you would have e^(2x+1) multiplied by the derivative of the function, resulting in 2e^(2x+1) by the Chain Rule.

Having said that, there is a flaw in your walkthrough. The derivative of e^(-x^2) would be, by the combination of the Chain Rule and the Power Rule, would be -2xe^(-x^2). Hence, your final answer should come out to -2x^{2}e^{-x^2}+e^{-x^2}.
Thanks everyone. Your posts helped a lot! What threw me off, I believe, is that e's exponent had itself an exponent.. but what I need to remember specifically is the bold part quoted above!

Thanks again :)
 
  • #11
I know this is probably really late, but I'd like to point out to rocomath his/her mistake in using the Leibniz notation: you should have used \frac{d}{dx}, not \frac{dy}{dx}. The first one means "take the derivative of" and the second means "the derivative of y with respect to x is".

Just being nitpicky. =]
 
  • #12
adartsesirhc said:
I know this is probably really late, but I'd like to point out to rocomath his/her mistake in using the Leibniz notation: you should have used \frac{d}{dx}, not \frac{dy}{dx}. The first one means "take the derivative of" and the second means "the derivative of y with respect to x is".

Just being nitpicky. =]
And that actually helped me understand Leibniz a bit better! Thanks :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K