Derivative problem that I thought would be easy

  • Thread starter Thread starter Loopas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative
Loopas
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
I've attached a picture of the problem.

The problem asks from f'(0) of the function:

f(x)=e^(2x)*g(x)

g(0)=-5 and g'(0)=3 are given.

So the answer I came to was:

f'(x)=2e^(2x)*g'(x)

However, when I work out the numbers I get:

f'(0)=6

This is not right. So I figured I made a mistake a mistake when taking the derivative of f(x). Now I'm stuck because I'm not sure how to derive the function when g(x) isn't explicitly given.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    35.4 KB · Views: 390
Physics news on Phys.org
Loopas said:
I've attached a picture of the problem.

The problem asks from f'(0) of the function:

f(x)=e^(2x)*g(x)

g(0)=-5 and g'(0)=3 are given.

So the answer I came to was:

f'(x)=2e^(2x)*g'(x)

However, when I work out the numbers I get:

f'(0)=6

This is not right. So I figured I made a mistake a mistake when taking the derivative of f(x). Now I'm stuck because I'm not sure how to derive the function when g(x) isn't explicitly given.

Yes, you made a mistake when taking the derivative of f(x). Use the product rule.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
The product rule say that:
(f(x)g(x))'=f'(x)g(x)+f(x)g'(x)
You did:
(f(x)g(x))'=f'(x)g'(x)
Which is incorrect.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Wow, thanks guys. Sometimes sleep deprivation can do some crazy things.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top