Derivatives and continuity / Lipschitz equation

Felafel
Messages
170
Reaction score
0
Hi! I think I've managed to solve this problem, but I'd like it to be checked

Homework Statement



show that if $$f : A\subset \mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$$ and has both right derivative:
$$f_{+}'(x_0),$$

and left derivative
$$f_{-}'(x_0)$$
in $$x_0\in A$$, then $$f$$
is continuos in
$$x_0.$$

The Attempt at a Solution



Let's assume $$f_{+}' > f_{-}'$$, as the derivative exists, it means it is $$< \infty$$.
Therefore, $$|f(x)-f(y)|≤f_{+}'|(x-y)|$$ is a Lipschitz equation, and for
$$|f(x)-f(x_0)|≤f_{+}'|(x-x_0)|$$
it is a lipschitz equation in x_0.
Thus, for the lipschitz equation properties, the function is continuos in $$x_0$$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Felafel said:
Therefore, $$|f(x)-f(y)|≤f_{+}'|(x-y)|$$ is a Lipschitz equation, and for
$$|f(x)-f(x_0)|≤f_{+}'|(x-x_0)|$$

How exactly did you obtain these inequalitities??

Also, you should type # instead of $. Typing

Code:
$$ ... $$

automatically places everything on a separate line. The command

Code:
## ... ##

does not do this.
 
micromass said:
How exactly did you obtain these inequalitities??

##|f(x)−f(y)|≤L|(x−y)|##
this is the definition of lipschitz equation,
while
##|f(x)−f(x0)|≤f′+|(x−x0)|##
is from lagrange's theorem
 
Felafel said:
##|f(x)−f(y)|≤L|(x−y)|##
this is the definition of lipschitz equation,
while
##|f(x)−f(x0)|≤f′+|(x−x0)|##
is from lagrange's theorem

What does Lagrange's theorem say? Are you really allowed to apply it in this case? Are all the conditions satisfied?
 
uhm.. ok, i guess i don't have all the conditions to apply lagrange actually.
any hint about how else i can solve it?
 
Felafel said:
uhm.. ok, i guess i don't have all the conditions to apply lagrange actually.
any hint about how else i can solve it?

Did you prove already that every differentiable functions is continuous? Can you try to adapt that proof?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top