Derivatives and exponential function

icystrike
Messages
444
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


attachment.php?attachmentid=22710&stc=1&d=1261854223.jpg


I don't understand why they took M(e)=1 , and how the proceed on with the proof.
Thanks in advance(=

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • help.JPG
    help.JPG
    7 KB · Views: 459
Physics news on Phys.org


Try to write the derivative of the exponential with the limit definition:

f'(x)=lim h->0 (f(x+h)-f(x))/h

and try to factor out e^x
 


yes. i understand . However, why did they take M(e)=1?
I can't really accept their explanation : M(2)<1 and M(4)>1 ,thus they allow M(e)=1..
My question is how about other real number between 2 to 4?
 
Last edited:


It's NOT so much "how" as "why". I presume that just before the section you quoted they showed that the derivative of e^x, for e any number, "M(e)e^x" where M(e) is a number depending on e only, not on x.

It is not too difficult to show that M(2) is less than one and that M(3) is larger than 1 (by numerically approximating the limits). "Choosing" M(e) to be 1 is really choosing a specific value of e such that M(e)= 1. My point about M(2) and M(3) is that there is such a value of e, between 2 and 3. You could, then, by a succesion of numerical approximations, show that M(2.7) is less than 1 but that M(2.8) is greater than 1 so "e" is between 2.7 and 2.8. Or that M(2.71) is less than 1 but that M(2.72) is greater than one so that "e" is between 2.71 and 2.72, etc.

Choosing "e" to be the number such that M(e)= 1 means that the derivative of the function y= e^x is just e^x again.
 


Oh! Thanks hallsofivy.(= I was rather taken aback by the fact that M(e)=1 and not any other real numbers between probably 2.71 to 2.72 . once again thanks!
 


Hi icystrike ;
M(e)=1 since e is defined to be the real number such that the area under the function
f(x)=1/x and x=1 ,x=e and the x-axis is equal to 1.
Best Wishes
Riad Zaidan
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top