Derivatives in spherical coordinates

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of derivatives in spherical coordinates, particularly in the context of quantum mechanics and the momentum operator. Participants are exploring how to express the momentum operator and its relation to the radial part of the Laplacian in spherical coordinates.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the transformation of the momentum operator from Cartesian to spherical coordinates, specifically regarding the representation of derivatives. There is a focus on the differences between the Cartesian and spherical forms of the Laplacian and the implications for the momentum operator.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various interpretations of the momentum operator in spherical coordinates, with some participants suggesting that the original expression may not be accurate. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity involved in converting derivatives between coordinate systems, and some guidance has been offered regarding the use of the gradient operator.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the Hamiltonian includes terms that may complicate the representation of the momentum operator. There is also mention of the curvature of spherical coordinates affecting the derivation process, and some participants express gratitude for resources that aid in understanding the topic.

maria clara
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
In quantum mechanics the momentum operator is a constant multiplied by the partial derivative d/dx. In spherical coordinates it's turning into something like that:
constant*(1/r)(d^2/dr^2)r

can anyone explain please how this result is obtained?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That doesn't look like d/dx, it looks like the radial part of the laplacian. It's a second derivative. In general to convert derivatives between coordinate systems you use the chain rule for partial derivatives.
 
the momentum operator is often written as -ihd/dx... but in that case x is the position vector. More generally, the momentum op is -ihDel (Del = the gradient operator, more easily generalized to different coordinate systems). (note also that i have written 'h' but mean "h-bar").
As dick said, the operator you've shown doesn't look quite right... if something is only changing radially, then the grad in spherical is just d/dr (i believe).
 
sorry, my mistake.
I meant the radial part of the (momentum)^2 in spherical coordinates.

If the Hamiltonian is:
(Pr)^2/2m + L^2/2mr^2 +V(r)

what's wrong in writing (Pr)^2 as
-(hbar)^2*(d/dr)^2
?

why is it written like that:
(-(hbar)^2/r)*(d/dr)^2*r
?
 
Because the grad^2 operator is only the sum of coordinate derivatives squared in cartesian coordinates. Spherical coordinates are curved. Here's a derivation.
http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/%3Chttp://planetmath.org/?method=l2h&from=collab&id=76&op=getobj
 
Last edited by a moderator:
BTW there are much better ways to derive this using differential geometry, but it gives you an idea of WHY the answer isn't as simple as you think. No need to follow all of the details.
 
wow... I'll take a look at that, thanks!
 
Dick said:
Because the grad^2 operator is only the sum of coordinate derivatives squared in cartesian coordinates. Spherical coordinates are curved. Here's a derivation.
http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/%3Chttp://planetmath.org/?method=l2h&from=collab&id=76&op=getobj
Just want to thank you, this website is basically my homework assignment this week. I have been getting my *** worked until i found this.
THANK YOU
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K