Deriving Equations of Motion for Compound Pendulum with 3 DOF

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the equations of motion for a compound pendulum with three degrees of freedom (DOF). The user is familiar with using Lagrangian mechanics for simple pendulums and seeks clarification on whether the system is a 3D conical pendulum or a 2D plane pendulum composed of three interconnected rods. The pendulum is described as a single irregular body with a 3x3 inertia tensor, fixed at a point and capable of movement in a 3D coordinate system. The key challenge lies in accurately modeling the motion with the specified degrees of freedom. Understanding the configuration of the pendulum is crucial for deriving the correct equations of motion.
msntito
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Can anyone help?
I have to derive eq of motion of a compound pendulum with 3 rotational dof.
I know how to do it, for simple pendulum (using Lagrangian's).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it literally a 3d (or conical) pendulum, or a 2d (plane) pendulum made of 3 rods, each with tied to the other by a junction point (thus with 3 degrees of freedom) ?
 
It is a single body (irregular shape with an Inertia tensor 3x3), fixed at a point, say O and can move in 3d rectangular coord system (3 rotational DOF...say alpha beta gamma).
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top