Deriving Kinematics Equations from First Principles

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving kinematics equations from first principles using calculus, specifically for an upcoming test on 2D motion. A student attempts to derive the vertical velocity equation (Vy) from the position equation (y) but initially encounters difficulties. By applying differentiation, they successfully derive Vy as (Vosin(theta)) - gt, confirming the relationship between position and velocity. The conversation emphasizes that understanding calculus and the principles of differentiation and antidifferentiation is crucial for deriving various kinematic equations. Overall, the derivation process highlights the importance of calculus in understanding motion in physics.
jackrc11
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For an upcoming test on 2D Motion, my Physics Teacher recommended that, instead of memorizing close to a dozen equations, he suggested we derive what we can from the main equations he showed us. So people in my class decided to split up deriving equations to bring them together later for everyone to use. I was told to use these two:
y = (Vosin(theta))t - 1/2gt^2
Vy = Vosin(theta) - gt

So I was attempting to derive Vy from y, but found an issue.

Homework Equations


y = (Vosin(theta))t - 1/2gt^2
Vy = (Vosin(theta)) - gt
V = d/t

The Attempt at a Solution


To derive Vy, I simply did ((Vosin(theta))t - 1/2gt^2)) / t. This gave me (Vosin(theta)) - 1/2gt. This differs from the given equation for Vy, so I'm curious what I have to do to cancel out the 1/2.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know any calculus? That's the way to derive the equations.
 
axmls said:
Do you know any calculus? That's the way to derive the equations.

Yes, I am in calculus this year! I didn't even think to find d/dt. This makes things a lot easier, thanks!

Using calculus, just to be sure I'm right, you can find

y' = Vy
Vy = 1 * (Vosin(theta)) - 1/2gt * 2, giving
Vy = (Vosin(theta)) - gt

That works out really well! Can that apply to a lot of other equations of motion (in Kinematics) as well?
 
jackrc11 said:
Can that apply to a lot of other equations of motion (in Kinematics) as well?

That's where kinematics equations come from!

It all comes from the fact that a = \frac{d^2 x}{dt^2} and the assumption that a is constant.

If you've learned about antidifferentiation (essentially the opposite of differentiation), then you can derive your equations from that equation alone. Since a = \frac{d v}{dt}, v = \int a \ dt = v_0 + a t. And since v = \frac{d x}{dt}, x = \int v \ dt = x_0 + v_0 t + \frac{1}{2} a t^2. If you haven't learned about antidifferentiation, you can at least confirm that you can work backwards from those by taking derivatives to get back to \frac{d^2 x}{dt^2} = a.

The equation that is not time-dependent is a bit trickier to derive, but that's essentially how the "usual" kinematics equations are derived. It all comes back to calculus--the mathematics of change.
 
  • Like
Likes jackrc11
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top