Deriving Kinematics Formula: Step-by-Step Guide with Explanation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Omar.Castillo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Kinematics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the kinematics formula d = 1/2(g)(t^2) for an object in free fall. Participants emphasize understanding the derivation step-by-step, suggesting resources like HyperPhysics for guidance. It is clarified that if the object is dropped (initial velocity Vo = 0), the formula simplifies from a more complex equation of motion. The conversation highlights the importance of basic calculus in grasping the underlying principles of kinematics. Understanding this derivation is seen as a key step in mastering fundamental physics concepts.
Omar.Castillo
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Ok guys I have a genius for a teacher and I want to get this assignment right. This is what he left me Also d = 1/2(g)(t^2)
Using the web resources, find out how to derive that last formula. Write down
the derivation line by line and provide your own comments next to each line.
If you can clarify to yourself why that formula is valid, you will have made a
significant step in understanding some basic physics.

I'll be looking for that derivation in you next email...

But I have no idea where to derive it from any basic formulas or Ideas will truly be helpful. Thanks guys
 
Physics news on Phys.org
are you familiar with derivatives and integrals?
 
No man that's what's wrong i barely took precalculus!
 
OK. Look here to see if this helps:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/imgmec/moteq4.gif

Look at eq.#3. If you imply that the object is DROPPED and not thrown down, that means that Vo = 0. It has no initial velocity. So equation #3 reduces to what you have. If you want to go into the derivation of the previous equations of motion, you will probably be better served by some basic calculus.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top