- #1
Niles
- 1,834
- 0
Hi
When we talk about shear stresses in a fluid, we find that the shear stress is given by
<br /> \tau_{xy} = \mu(\partial_y u + \partial_x v) = \tau_{yx}<br />
This relation we get when only looking at one side of our fluid-"cube". Now, in order to take into account the opposite side we assume that the fluid element is so small that the shear stress is constant, leading to the average
<br /> \tau_{xy} = \frac{1}{2}2\mu(\partial_y u + \partial_x v) = \mu(\partial_y u + \partial_x v) = \tau_{yx}<br />
Applying the same logic to the normal stresses gives me
<br /> \tau_{xx} = \frac{1}{2}\mu(\partial_x u + \partial_x u) = \mu(\partial_x u)<br />
However, in my textbook (White) it is given as
<br /> \tau_{xx} = 2\mu(\partial_x u)<br />
Where does this extra factor of 2 come from in the normal stress?
When we talk about shear stresses in a fluid, we find that the shear stress is given by
<br /> \tau_{xy} = \mu(\partial_y u + \partial_x v) = \tau_{yx}<br />
This relation we get when only looking at one side of our fluid-"cube". Now, in order to take into account the opposite side we assume that the fluid element is so small that the shear stress is constant, leading to the average
<br /> \tau_{xy} = \frac{1}{2}2\mu(\partial_y u + \partial_x v) = \mu(\partial_y u + \partial_x v) = \tau_{yx}<br />
Applying the same logic to the normal stresses gives me
<br /> \tau_{xx} = \frac{1}{2}\mu(\partial_x u + \partial_x u) = \mu(\partial_x u)<br />
However, in my textbook (White) it is given as
<br /> \tau_{xx} = 2\mu(\partial_x u)<br />
Where does this extra factor of 2 come from in the normal stress?
