Deriving power from the relativistic energy equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the power equation from the relativistic energy equation, specifically how to express power as the derivative of energy with respect to time. The user initially presented a messy derivation and sought clarification on a cleaner approach. Feedback highlighted the confusion in notation, particularly regarding the use of vectors for force and velocity, suggesting the dot product instead of a cross product. A comparison with momentum squared helped clarify the derivation process. Overall, the exchange emphasizes the importance of proper notation and understanding vector relationships in physics.
Xamien
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I recently finished a test that asks you to derive
Power = \frac{dE}{dt} = F \times v
from the energy equation:
E^2 = E_{0}^2 + (pc)^2

Homework Equations


Power = \frac{dE}{dt} = F \times v
E^2 = E_{0}^2 + (pc)^2
p = \gamma m v

The Attempt at a Solution


I got there in kind of a messy way but I would like to know how I could have more cleanly shown how to put it together. Here's the way I got to it:
2E \frac{dE}{dt} = 0 + 2pc \frac{dp}{dt}
2(\gamma mc^2) \frac{dE}{dt} = 0 + 2 \gamma mvc \frac{dp}{dt}
\frac{dp}{dt} = F \stackrel{and\rightarrow}{} \frac{dx}{dt} = v
therefore \frac{dE}{dt} = P = Fv

Of course, I also realize I may have bungled this, so corrections or at least references to the rules would also be much appreciated. Please, weigh in.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your notation is a little confusing because both the force F and the velocity v are vectors, so using the symbol \times looks like you're taking the cross product of the two. What you want to show is\frac{dE}{dt} = \vec{F}\cdot\vec{v}Use the fact that \vec{p}^2 = \vec{p}\cdot\vec{p} and just basically do what you did, and you'll get that result.
 
Sorry about the notation confusion. Still getting used to using LateX.

The lightbulb came on with that comparison with the momentum squared. Thank you very much!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top