Deriving the Gravitational Jerk Equation and Solving for Time and Position

  • Thread starter Thread starter MCarroll
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jerk
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving a function that expresses position in terms of time under gravitational acceleration. The Gravitational Jerk Equation is presented, but the user struggles to resolve it for time. They successfully derive a time function, t = -K * s * √(s₀ - s), but seek assistance in solving for separation, s. The conversation highlights the challenges of working with cubic equations resulting from squaring both sides and acknowledges the need for further mathematical understanding. Overall, the thread emphasizes the complexities of gravitational equations and invites constructive feedback on the derivations presented.
MCarroll
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Is anyone aware of a function expressesing position (separation) in terms of time, s=f(x), given only acceleration due to the force of gravity.

I am aware of the Gravitational Jerk Equation

J= \frac{2Gm}{s^{3}} \frac{ds}{dt}

where

m=mass of attracting object
G = gravitational constant

But I can't resolve this for t.

Although I have derived an equation giving dt = f(s) as

t = - \sqrt{\frac{2}{Gm}} * s *\sqrt{s_{0}-s}

given v(o) = 0 (start at rest)

where

s = instantaneous separation
s(o) = orignal separation

which for a given mass of attractor m simplifies to

t = - K * s *\sqrt{s_{0}-s}

I don't know how to solve this for s. Any thoughts?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
you don't know how to take the square of both sides? :confused:

although i don't understand how you derived that equation
 
I got some help on the Math forum so I think I am ok but I was not aware of the resolvant quadratic necessary to solve the cubic of s that results from squaring both sides. I should have mentioned my limited math ability in the first place.

I'll show my derivation of t = f(s) when I have some more time, welcoming all criticism.
 
Last edited:
EDIT/

here is what I have

s = s(o) - (at^2)/2 where v(0) = 0 and movement is in the negative direction with respect to scalar s(o).

2*(s_{0}-s) = - at^{2}

or

2*(s_{0}-s) = at^{2}

\sqrt{2*(s_{0}-s)} = t * \sqrt{a}

t = \sqrt{2*(s_{0}-s)/a}

but a = - Gm/(s^2), so

t = - \sqrt{\frac{2}{Gm}} * s *\sqrt{s_{0}-s}

please criticize.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top