Deriving the Inelastic 3-Body Equation for Colliding Balls with Different Masses

  • Thread starter Thread starter GreenSabbath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Body Collision
AI Thread Summary
To derive the inelastic 3-body equation for colliding balls of different masses, the conservation of momentum principle is essential, where momentum before the collision equals momentum after. The discussion emphasizes the need to consider the center of mass for calculations, although this approach is typically limited to two-body collisions. The problem involves analyzing two scenarios: varying the mass of the top ball and then varying the mass of the larger base ball, both falling from a fixed height. The focus is on incorporating the collision with the ground into the general inelastic equation. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately modeling the behavior of the system.
GreenSabbath
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
What equation should I use to represent a 3 body inelastic equation .. two ball of different masses falling together and colliding with the stationary ground.

And any hints on deriving the two body equation shown below
 

Attachments

  • a8a9e87d40533ad47fadb40725a4a3e5.png
    a8a9e87d40533ad47fadb40725a4a3e5.png
    1.2 KB · Views: 427
Physics news on Phys.org
momentum before equals momentum after.

or you could calculate the centre of mass. but that would only work for a two body collision (i think).
 
Why don't you describe the exact problem you are trying to solve?
 
Im writing a research essay on balls of different mass falling from a fixed height onto the floor. Divided into two parts, I first vary the mass of the top ball and then for the next part I vary the mass of the bigger base ball. No I am using the general inelastic equation.. attached above and I need to go about first deriving it and then incoporating a collision with the floor. So a 3 body collision?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top