Deriving the mass conservation integral in GR

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the mass conservation integral in general relativity using a general axisymmetric metric. The user has successfully applied the Euler-Lagrange equations to establish relationships between metric components and constants E and L_z. However, they encounter difficulties in deriving the mass conservation integral from their rearranged equation. Suggestions include using LaTeX for clarity in presenting formulas, which may facilitate better responses. Overall, the user seeks guidance on progressing from their current equations to the desired integral.
tcw
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Starting from a general axisymmetric metric
ds^2=g_tt dt^2 + 2g_tφ dtdφ +g_φφ dφ^2 + g_rr dr^2+g_θθ dθ^2 ...(0)
where the metric components are functions of the coordinates r and θ only.

I've managed to show (via Euler-Lagrange equations) that
g_tt dt/dτ + g_tφ dφ/dτ = E ...(1) and
g_tφ dt/dτ + g_φφ dφ/dτ = -L_z ...(2)
(where E and L_z are constants, and τ an affine parameter)

I am required to derive the mass conservation integral:
g_rr (dr/dτ)^2 + g_θθ (dθ/dτ)^2 = -V_eff (r,θ,E,L_z)
which I'm having trouble doing.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Dividing (0) by dτ^2 and substituting (1) and (2), and re-arranging gives:
g_rr (dr/dτ)^2 + g_θθ (dθ/dτ)^2 = (ds/dτ)^2 - E dt/dτ + L_z dφ/dτ ...(3)
but I'm not sure where to go from here.

I thought about trying to solve (1) and (2) simultaneously for dt/dτ and dφ/dτ to substitute into (3) but that doesn't seem to work.

I'd appreciate any help, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've spent a bit more time and still no luck. Any pointers?
 
Should I latex it up to get responses?
 
tcw said:
Should I latex it up to get responses?
Just the fact that you didn't use LaTeX isn't itself a reason for people not to answer your question, but it would definitely help if you can put those formulas in LaTeX. I just tried reading through your question and it's kind of hard to parse with the formulas written out in text.
 
diazona said:
Just the fact that you didn't use LaTeX isn't itself a reason for people not to answer your question, but it would definitely help if you can put those formulas in LaTeX. I just tried reading through your question and it's kind of hard to parse with the formulas written out in text.

Thanks for your help, I'll do that then.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top